Showing my work (I have intentionally not listed several things as I am holding those cards for the time being). The Hill Cantons cosmology inspiration mix Jack Vance novels (absurdist satire of religious mores) Poul Anderson's The Broken Sword and Three Hearts, Bachman's Dragon article (the Weird and its cosmic juxtaposition to human civilization, the waxing/waning of gods being tied to the amount of human worship and the reduction of “Faerie”) Leiber's Lankhmar stories (more satire, petty gods and apotheosis) Early Renaissance Catholicism, Mediterranean hero-cults, Hellenistic and Roman sun-cults, Theosophy, Jewish neoplatinism and mystical traditions, Piper's Lord Kalvan, Early Christian theological disputes (Sun Lord) Hussites, Mormon feminism, William Blake's poetic mythology around the Triple Goddess (Celestial Lady) Slavic pagan mythology (Pahr Old Gods and a number of godlings) Hindu and Native American creation myths (World Turtle) M.A.R Barker's Creat...
I recognize that this is a working draft; these are just the questions that pop to mind as I read it.
ReplyDelete* What do you envision by the "special rights" that primary authors are supposed to have?
* What is meant by "Creator/Worker Ownership or at least A More than Fair Shake"? The second phrase is kinda opaque to me.
* How are percentages of work determined? (Partners? Project primary author?)
Humza K
ReplyDelete1. Those outlined in the bullets below. I just wanted to flag that it was a special category above and beyond whether someone is a member or partner.
2. Sorry that really will be filled out later. Basically it's that we are either committed to people keeping their copyrights as primary authors or at least have a very generous terms that go beyond the traditional publisher/author arrangement.
3. We haven't figured that out yet. Personally I lean toward "partners and primary author decide/negotiate that jointly."
Looks reasonable to me, a few details to be nailed down and perhaps the more "vision" related bits to be explicated. This is an LLC, I take it or going to be?
ReplyDeleteamendment to 2. it also means that we are committed to having anyone who works on a project have at the least a level of ownership stakes in that project.
ReplyDeletetrey causey we are already officially a Texas-based "member" LLC (which means its owned by more than one person).
ReplyDeleteI thought I might have seen that somewhere, but I wasn't sure.
ReplyDelete